Bacteremia by non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae: Case description and literature review / Bacteriemia por Vibrio cholerae no-O1/no-O139: descripción de un caso y revisión de la literatura

Bacteremia by non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae is a rare entity associated with high mortality rates. We report a case of non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae bacteremia confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and agglutination tests. The clinicoepidemiological characteristics and therapeutic options for this infection are also described.

La bacteriemia por Vibrio cholerae no-O1/no-O139 es una entidad poco frecuente que se asocia con altas tasas de mortalidad. Se reporta un caso de bacteriemia por V. cholerae no-O1/no-O139 confirmado por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa y test de aglutinación. Se describen las características clinicoepidemiológicas y las opciones terapéuticas para esta infección.

Mortality Caused by Candida auris Bloodstream Infections in Comparison with Other Candida Species, a Multicentre Retrospective Cohort.

Candida auris is an emerging pathogen considered to be critical in the World Health Organization fungal organisms list. The study aims to determine the mortality and hospital stays attributed to Candida auris (C. auris) compared to other Candida species in adult patients with candidemia. A retrospective cohort of adults with candidemia was examined from seven centres in Colombia between 2016 and 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay among survivors. Adjustment of the confounding variables was performed using inverse probability weights of exposure propensity score (candidemia by C. auris), survival regression models (Weibull distribution), and a counting model (negative binomial distribution). A value of 244 (47.6%) of the 512 patients with candidemia died within the first 30 days. The crude mortality in C. auris was 38.1% vs. 51.1% in Candida non-auris (CNA). In the Weibull model, mortality in the C. auris group was lower (adjusted HR: aHR- 0.69, 95% CI: 0.53-0.90). Antifungal treatment also decreased mortality, with an aHR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.27-0.47), while the presence of septic shock on patient progression increased it, with an aHR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.41-2.13). Among the patients who survived, no differences in the length of hospital stay were observed between the C. auris and the CNA groups, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.68-1.22). Mortality in patients with C. auris bloodstream infections appears lower when adjusted for numerous confounding variables regarding treatment and the presence of septic shock in patient progression. We identified no significant effect of C. auris on the length of hospital stay in surviving patients.

Genomic Diversity of Burkholderia pseudomallei Isolates, Colombia.

We report an analysis of the genomic diversity of isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the cause of melioidosis, recovered in Colombia from routine surveillance during 2016-2017. B. pseudomallei appears genetically diverse, suggesting it is well established and has spread across the region.

Needles in a haystack: Extremely rare invasive fungal infections reported in FungiScopeⓇ-Global Registry for Emerging Fungal Infections.

OBJECTIVES: Emerging invasive fungal infections (IFI) have become a notable challenge. Apart from the more frequently described fusariosis, lomentosporiosis, mucormycosis, scedosporiosis, and certain dematiaceae or yeasts, little is known about extremely rare IFI. METHODS: Extremely rare IFI collected in the FungiScopeⓇ registry were grouped as Dematiaceae, Hypocreales, Saccharomycetales, Eurotiales, Dermatomycetes, Agaricales, and Mucorales. RESULTS: Between 2003 and June 2019, 186 extremely rare IFI were documented in FungiScopeⓇ. Dematiaceae (35.5%), Hypocreales (23.1%), Mucorales (11.8%), and Saccharomycetales (11.3%) caused most IFI. Most patients had an underlying malignancy (38.7%) with acute leukemia accounting for 50% of cancers. Dissemination was observed in 26.9% of the patients. Complete or partial clinical response rate was 68.3%, being highest in Eurotiales (82.4%) and in Agaricales (80.0%). Overall mortality rate was 29.3%, ranging from 11.8% in Eurotiales to 50.0% in Mucorales. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are confronted with a complex variety of fungal pathogens, for which treatment recommendations are lacking and successful outcome might be incidental. Through an international consortium of physicians and scientists, these cases of extremely rare IFI can be collected to further investigate their epidemiology and eventually identify effective treatment regimens.

Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Diagnóstico y Manejo de las Infecciones de Piel y Tejidos Blandos en Colombia / Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Colombia

Las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos (IPTB) representan la tercera causa de consulta por enfermedad infecciosas a los servicios médicos, después de las infecciones respiratorias y urinarias. Se presenta una guía de práctica clínica (GPC) con 38 recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia, graduadas bajo el sistema SIGN, para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de pacientes adultos con IPTB en el contexto colombiano, posterior a un proceso de adaptación de GPC publicadas y la búsqueda sistemática y síntesis de literatura para la actualización de la evidencia científica. Además, se realizó un consenso de expertos para la evaluación de las potenciales barreras para la implementación de las recomendaciones y la evaluación del grado de recomendación en el contexto local.

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) represent the third leading cause of infectious disease consultation for medical services after respiratory and urinary tract infections. This document generates a clinical practice guideline with 38 recommendations based on evidence, graduated under the SIGN system for the diagnosis and treatment for SSTI infections in adult patients in Colombia, following a process of adaptation of guidelines published, and the systematic search and synthesis of literature for the updating of scientific evidence. In addition, a consensus of experts was made for the evaluation of the potential barriers for the implementation of the recommendations and the evaluation of the degree of recommendation in the local context.

Matched-paired analysis of patients treated for invasive mucormycosis: standard treatment versus posaconazole new formulations (MoveOn).

BACKGROUND: First-line antifungal treatment for invasive mucormycosis (IM) consists of liposomal amphotericin B. Salvage treatment options are limited and often based on posaconazole oral suspension. With the approval of posaconazole new formulations, patients could benefit from improved pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of posaconazole new formulations for IM treatment. METHODS: We performed a case-matched analysis with proven or probable IM patients from the FungiScope® Registry. First-line posaconazole new formulations (1st-POSnew) and first-line amphotericin B plus posaconazole new formulations (1st-AMB+POSnew) cases were matched with first-line amphotericin B-based (1st-AMB) treatment controls. Salvage posaconazole new formulations (SAL-POSnew) cases were matched with salvage posaconazole oral suspension (SAL-POSsusp) controls. Each case was matched with up to three controls (based on severity, haematological/oncological malignancy, surgery and/or renal dysfunction). RESULTS: Five patients receiving 1st-POSnew, 18 receiving 1st-AMB+POSnew and 22 receiving SAL-POSnew were identified. By day 42, a favourable response was reported for 80.0% (n = 4/5) of patients receiving 1st-POSnew, for 27.8% (n = 5/18) receiving 1st-AMB+POSnew and for 50.0% (n = 11/22) receiving SAL-POSnew. Day 42 all-cause mortality of patients receiving posaconazole new formulations was lower compared with controls [20.0% (n = 1/5) in 1st-POSnew versus 53.3% (n = 8/15) in 1st-AMB; 33.3% (n = 6/18) in 1st-AMB+POSnew versus 52.0% (n = 26/50) in 1st-AMB; and 0.0% (n = 0/22) in SAL-POSnew versus 4.4% (n = 2/45) in SAL-POSsusp]. CONCLUSIONS: Posaconazole new formulations were effective in terms of treatment response and associated mortality of IM. While posaconazole new formulations may be an alternative for treatment of IM, the limited sample size of our study calls for a cautious interpretation of these observations.

Risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized patients in Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) represent a major clinical problem in Colombia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with MRSA SSTI in Colombia. METHODS: A multicenter cohort study with nested case-control design was performed. Patients with an SSTI with at least 48h of inpatient care were included. Patients with an MRSA SSTI were considered the case group and patients with either a non-MRSA SSTI or with an Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) SSTI were the control groups. A multivariate logistic regression approach was used to evaluate risk factors associated with MRSA SSTI with two different statistical models. RESULTS: A total 1134 patients were included. Cultures were positive for 498 patients, of which 52% (n=259) were Staphylococcus aureus. MRSA was confirmed in 68.3% of the S. aureus cultures. In the first model, independent risk factors for MRSA SSTI were identified as the presence of abscess (P<0.0001), cellulitis (P=0.0007), age 18-44 years (P=0.001), and previous outpatient treatment in the previous index visit (P=0.003); surgical site infection was a protective factor (P=0.008). In the second model, the main risk factor found was previous outpatient treatment in the previous index visit (P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Community-acquired SSTIs in Colombia are commonly caused by MRSA. Therefore, clinicians should consider MRSA when designing the initial empirical treatment for purulent SSTI in Colombia, although there seems to be low awareness of this fact.

Actividad in vitro del tedizolid y de antibióticos de comparación en aislamientos de Staphylococcus aureus resistentes a meticilina en infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en siete hospitales de Colombia / In vitro activity of tedizolid and other comparator drugs in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in skin and soft tissue infections in seven Colombian hospitals

Introducción. Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM) causa infecciones graves de la piel y los tejidos blandos en los hospitales y, en los últimos años, en la comunidad. El tedizolid es una nueva oxazolidinona cuya potencia in vitro ha demostrado ser mayor que la del linezolid frente a este microorganismo. Objetivo. Conocer la actividad antimicrobiana del tedizolid y de algunos antibióticos de comparación en aislamientos de SARM causante de infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en hospitales de Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo y descriptivo a lo largo de doce meses en siete hospitales de tercer nivel de Colombia. Se recolectaron aislamientos de SARM de pacientes adultos con infección de piel y tejidos blandos. Se determinó la concentración inhibitoria mínima (CIM) mediante la técnica de ETEST® (bioMérieux) del tedizolid, el linezolid, la vancomicina, la daptomicina, el trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol y la clindamicina. Resultados. Se obtuvieron aislamientos de SARM de 102 pacientes, de los cuales 56 (54,9 %) eran hombres; el promedio de edad fue de 46,8 años. La infección tuvo origen en la comunidad en 77 casos (75,4 %). El tipo de muestra que predominó fue el absceso (69 pacientes: 67,6 %). Todos los aislamientos fueron sensibles a tedizolid, linezolid, daptomicina, trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol y vancomicina. La actividad in vitro del tedizolid fue mayor que la del linezolid. Los intervalos de la CIM del tedizolid oscilaron entre 0,125 µg/ml y 0,5 µg/ml en tanto que los del linezolid fluctuaron entre 1 µg/m y 2 µg/ml. Conclusiones. Las cepas circulantes de SARM en Colombia presentaron una gran sensibilidad al tedizolid, por lo cual sería una alternativa terapéutica para las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en nuestro medio.

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes severe skin and soft tissue infections in hospitals and, more recently, in the community. Tedizolid is a new second-generation oxazolidinone derivative having greater in vitro potency than linezolid against this type of microorganism. Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of tedizolid and other comparator antibiotics in MRSA isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections in Colombian hospitals. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-center descriptive study in seven tertiary-level hospitals in Colombia along a 12-month period. MRSA isolates were collected from adult patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Tedizolid, linezolid, vancomycin, daptomycin, trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by ETEST® (bioMérieux). Results: MRSA isolates were obtained from 102 patients with an average age of 46.8 years of whom 56 (54.9%) were men. Infection was community-acquired in 77 cases (75.4%). Abscess-related samples predominated (69 patients: 67.6%). All isolates were susceptible to tedizolid, linezolid, daptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Tedizolid had greater in vitro activity than linezolid. Tedizolid MIC intervals ranged from 0.125 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL while those of linezolid ranged from 1µg/mL to 2µg/mL. Conclusions: MRSA strains circulating in Colombia are highly susceptible to tedizolid and can be considered a therapeutic alternative for hospitals and/or community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections.

Single-tube classical PCR for Candida auris and Candida haemulonii identification / PCR múltiple para la identificación de Candida auris y Candida haemulonii

Background: Candida auris and Candida haemulonii are emerging and multiresistant pathogens. C. auris has produced hospital outbreaks and is misidentified by phenotypic-based methods. The only reliable identification methods are DNA sequencing and MALDI-TOF. Aims: To develop a classical-PCR method capable of rapidly and accurately identify C. auris and C. haemulonii. Methods: A multiplex PCR was carried out in one tube that included an internal control and oligonucleotides that specifically hybridize to the ITS2 region of C. auris and C. haemulonii. The usefulness of the new method was verified by testing a collection of 50 strains of 20 different species (previously identified by ITS sequencing). The selection of species was made in order to emulate the C. auris panel used by the CDC to validate diagnostic tools. In addition, other yeast species not included in the aforementioned panel were incorporated based on reported identification errors. Results: The results obtained with the proposed protocol were in total agreement with those obtained by ITS sequencing. Conclusions: We present a PCR method able to unequivocally identify C. auris and differentiate it from C. haemulonii. It is inexpensive, fast and it could be a useful tool to reduce the chances of a C. auris outbreak

Antecedentes: Candida auris y Candida haemulonii son patógenos emergentes y multirresistentes. C. auris ha sido responsable de brotes hospitalarios y no se puede identificar por métodos fenotípicos. Los únicos métodos de identificación confiables incluyen la secuenciación y el MALDI-TOF. Objetivos: Desarrollar un método de PCR clásica capaz de identificar rápidamente C. auris y C. haemulonii. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una PCR múltiple en un tubo que incluyó un control interno y oligonucleótidos que hibridan específicamente con la región ITS2 de C. auris y C. haemulonii. Para comprobar la utilidad del método se utilizó una colección de 50 aislamientos de 20 especies diferentes (identificadas por secuenciación del ITS). La selección de especies se hizo con el fin de emular el panel de especies que ofrece el CDC para la correcta identificación de C. auris. Además, se incluyeron especies que son confundidas con C. auris y no están incluidas en el citado panel. Resultados: Los resultados obtenidos con el protocolo propuesto estuvieron en total acuerdo con los obtenidos por la secuenciación del ITS. Conclusiones: El método que presentamos es capaz de identificar inequívocamente C. auris y diferenciarla de C. haemulonii. Es barato, rápido y podría ser una herramienta útil para reducir la posibilidad de brotes por C. auris

Single-tube classical PCR for Candida auris and Candida haemulonii identification.

BACKGROUND: Candida auris and Candida haemulonii are emerging and multiresistant pathogens. C. auris has produced hospital outbreaks and is misidentified by phenotypic-based methods. The only reliable identification methods are DNA sequencing and MALDI-TOF. AIMS: To develop a classical-PCR method capable of rapidly and accurately identify C. auris and C. haemulonii. METHODS: A multiplex PCR was carried out in one tube that included an internal control and oligonucleotides that specifically hybridize to the ITS2 region of C. auris and C. haemulonii. The usefulness of the new method was verified by testing a collection of 50 strains of 20 different species (previously identified by ITS sequencing). The selection of species was made in order to emulate the C. auris panel used by the CDC to validate diagnostic tools. In addition, other yeast species not included in the aforementioned panel were incorporated based on reported identification errors. RESULTS: The results obtained with the proposed protocol were in total agreement with those obtained by ITS sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: We present a PCR method able to unequivocally identify C. auris and differentiate it from C. haemulonii. It is inexpensive, fast and it could be a useful tool to reduce the chances of a C. auris outbreak.

In vitro activity of tedizolid and other comparator drugs in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in skin and soft tissue infections in seven Colombian hospitals / Actividad in vitro del tedizolid y de antibióticos de comparación en aislamientos de Staphylococcus aureus resistentes a meticilina en infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en siete hospitales de Colombia.

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes severe skin and soft tissue infections in hospitals and, more recently, in the community. Tedizolid is a new second-generation oxazolidinone derivative having greater in vitro potency than linezolid against this type of microorganism. Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of tedizolid and other comparator antibiotics in MRSA isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections in Colombian hospitals. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-center descriptive study in seven tertiary-level hospitals in Colombia along a 12-month period. MRSA isolates were collected from adult patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Tedizolid, linezolid, vancomycin, daptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and clindamycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by ETEST® (bioMérieux). Results: MRSA isolates were obtained from 102 patients with an average age of 46.8 years of whom 56 (54.9%) were men. Infection was community-acquired in 77 cases (75.4%). Abscess-related samples predominated (69 patients: 67.6%). All isolates were susceptible to tedizolid, linezolid, daptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Tedizolid had greater in vitro activity than linezolid. Tedizolid MIC intervals ranged from 0.125 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL while those of linezolid ranged from 1µg/mL to 2µg/mL. Conclusions: MRSA strains circulating in Colombia are highly susceptible to tedizolid and can be considered a therapeutic alternative for hospitals and/or community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections.

Introducción. Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM) causa infecciones graves de la piel y los tejidos blandos en los hospitales y, en los últimos años, en la comunidad. El tedizolid es una nueva oxazolidinona cuya potencia in vitro ha demostrado ser mayor que la del linezolid frente a este microorganismo.Objetivo. Conocer la actividad antimicrobiana del tedizolid y de algunos antibióticos de comparación en aislamientos de SARM causante de infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en hospitales de Colombia.Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo y descriptivo a lo largo de doce meses en siete hospitales de tercer nivel de Colombia. Se recolectaron aislamientos de SARM de pacientes adultos con infección de piel y tejidos blandos. Se determinó la concentración inhibitoria mínima (CIM) mediante la técnica de ETEST® (bioMérieux) del tedizolid, el linezolid, la vancomicina, la daptomicina, el trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol y la clindamicina.Resultados. Se obtuvieron aislamientos de SARM de 102 pacientes, de los cuales 56 (54,9 %) eran hombres; el promedio de edad fue de 46,8 años. La infección tuvo origen en la comunidad en 77 casos (75,4 %). El tipo de muestra que predominó fue el absceso (69 pacientes: 67,6 %). Todos los aislamientos fueron sensibles a tedizolid, linezolid, daptomicina, trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol y vancomicina. La actividad in vitro del tedizolid fue mayor que la del linezolid. Los intervalos de la CIM del tedizolid oscilaron entre 0,125 µg/ml y 0,5 µg/ml en tanto que los del linezolid fluctuaron entre 1 µg/m y 2 µg/ml.Conclusiones. Las cepas circulantes de SARM en Colombia presentaron una gran sensibilidad al tedizolid, por lo cual sería una alternativa terapéutica para las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos en nuestro medio.

Tigeciclina en infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos complicadas / Tigecycline in complicated skin and soft-tissue infection

Objetivo: evaluar la mejor evidencia actual disponible para generar recomendaciones con respecto a la efectividad y seguridad del uso de tigeciclina en adultos con infección de piel y tejidos blandos (IPTB). Materiales y métodos: se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura, seleccionando los metaanálisis y experimentos clínicos controlados (ECCs), los cuales se valoraron utilizando la herramienta SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.), con el fin de generar tablas de evidencia según GRADE de los estudios de tigeciclina en la indicación de IPTB, para posteriormente utilizar un proceso Delphi modificado para calificar las diferentes recomendaciones. Resultados: la revisión sistemática se incluyeron 9 metaanálisis que incluyeron 5 estudios clínicos aleatorizados con 1873 pacientes, y de ellos 952 asignados al brazo de tigeciclina, no mostró inferioridad frente a los comparadores en curación clínica (RR= 0.76 IC95% 0,57 - 1.03), curación microbiológica (RR= 0.92 IC95% 0,61 - 1.38), eventos adversos serios RR 1,41 (IC95%0,97 a 2,35), ni mortalidad RR 1,9 (IC95%0,84 a 4,3). La tigeciclina puede relacionarse con mayor frecuencia de eventos adversos leves de origen gastrointestinal. Conclusión: en pacientes adultos con IPTB, se considera que el uso de tigeciclina en monoterapia en pacientes no críticamente enfermos es equivalente en eficacia a otras opciones terapéuticas antimicrobianas. Se debe considerar especialmente como terapia de ajuste en pacientes con infecciones polimicrobianas.

Objective: To assess current best evidence available to generate recommendations regarding the effectiveness and safety of tigecycline use in adults with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs). Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by selecting meta-analyzes and controlled clinical trials (CCTs), which were assessed using the SIGN tool (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) in order to generate evidence tables according to GRADE of studies of tigecycline in the SSTIs indication, and then using a modified Delphi Method to score the different recommendations. Results: Nine meta-analyzes were included compounded by five randomized clinical trials with a sample size of 1873 patients, where 952 patients were assigned to tigecycline. The group of patients with tigecycline showed no inferiority to the comparator in clinical cure (RR = 0.76 95% CI 0.57 - 1.03), microbiologic cure (RR = 0.92 95% CI 0.61 - 1.38), serious adverse events RR 1, 41 (95% CI 0.97 to 2.35) or mortality RR 1.9 (95% CI 0.84 to 4.3). Tigecycline may be related to increased frequency of minor adverse events of gastrointestinal origin. Conclusion: In adult patients with SSTIs, it is considered that the use of tigecycline in monotherapy in non-critically ill patients is equivalent in effectiveness to other antimicrobial treatment options. It should be especially considered as an adjustment therapy in patients with polymicrobial infections.

Tigeciclina en infecciones intraabdominales complicadas / Tigecycline in complicated intra-abdominal infections

Objetivo: evaluar la mejor evidencia actual disponible para generar recomendaciones, con respecto a la efectividad y seguridad del uso de tigeciclina en adultos con infección intraabdominal complicada. Materiales y métodos: se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura, seleccionando los metaanálisis y experimentos clínicos controlados, los cuales se valora- ron utilizando la herramienta SIGN, con el fin de generar tablas de evidencia según GRADE de los estudios de tigeciclina en la indicación infección intraabdominal complicada, para posteriormente utilizar un proceso Delphi modificado para calificar las diferentes recomendaciones con el fin de generar un consenso. Resultados: se analizaron los resultados basados en la revisión sistemática de la literatura en la que se incluyeron 5 metaanálisis que cumplieron los criterios de selección comparando tigeciclina con otros tratamientos antibióticos en infección intraabdominal complicada; de los cuales, 2711 pacientes recibieron al menos una dosis del antibiótico (1382 tigeciclina y 1389 el comparador) y en los que no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los desenlaces evaluados al comparar tigeciclina con otros antibióticos. Conclusión: en pacientes adultos con infección intraabdominal complicada, se considera que el uso de tigeciclina en monoterapia es equivalente en eficacia y seguridad a otras opciones terapéuticas antimicrobianas y no representa un exceso de mortalidad en comparación a otros antibióticos

Objective: To assess current best evidence available to generate recommendations regarding the effectiveness and safety of tigecycline use in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAIs). Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review of published meta-analysis that evaluated tigecycline compared to other antimicrobials and included the indication of cIAI. Quality of the evidence was evaluated by using the SIGN tool (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) according to GRADE, and final recommendations were assessed by a modified Delphi Method in order to develop a consensus. Results: Five meta-analyzes met the selection criteria comparing tigecycline with other antibiotic treatments in complicated intra-abdominal infection. Five randomized clinical trials comprised in these meta-analysis included 2711 patients that received at least one dose of antibiotic (1382 tigecycline and 1389 the comparator regimen), We found no statistically significant differences in the evaluated outcomes by comparing tigecycline with other antibiotics, including clinical and microbiologic efficacy, safety and drug related mortality Conclusion: In adult patients with cIAIs, the use of tigecycline as monotherapy is equivalent in effectiveness to other antimicrobial therapeutic options and does not represent an increase in mortality compared to other antibiotics.

Manifestaciones clínicas y radiológicas de infección respiratoria por virus de influenza A H1N1 / Influenza A H1N1 virus respiratory infection: Clinical and radiological manifestations

Entre junio de 2009 y agosto de 2010 la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) declaró una pandemia por el virus de infl uenza AH1N1. Para junio 2010 se habían confi rmado en Colombia 3.572 casos de infección respiratoria por el virus de infl uenza AH1N1 con una mortalidad de 239 pacientes. Objetivos: Describir las manifestaciones radiológicas de un grupo de 38 pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de infección respiratoria por influenza A(H1N1) que requirieron hospitalización. Correlacionar las alteraciones radiológicas con la presentación clínica de los pacientes estudiados en la serie. Metodología: Análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas y estudios de imágenes de una cohorte de 38 pacientes con diagnóstico confirmado de infección por influenza A (H1N1) hospitalizados en el Hospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi en Bogotá entre junio de 2009 y marzo de 2010. Los pacientes fueron divididos en dos grupos de acuerdo a la necesidad de soporte ventilatorio durante la hospitalización. Los estudios de imágenes fueron revisados en consenso por dos radiólogos con experiencia en radiología torácica. Resultados: De las 38 radiografías de tórax analizadas, 23 (60%) fueron normales. En las radiografías anormales (40% de los casos), las alteraciones más importantes fueron consolidación y vidrio esmerilado. En el grupo que requirió ventilación mecánica, todas las radiografías fueron anormales. Conclusiones: En nuestra serie, los hallazgos en los estudios de imágenes se correlacionaron con la severidad del cuadro clínico. En los pacientes que no requirieron ventilación mecánica, la radiografía de tórax fue normal en un 60%. Todos los pacientes que necesitaron soporte ventilatorio tenían alteraciones radiológicas al ingreso. En los pacientes que requirieron ventilación mecánica, la alteración radiológica predominante fue consolidación de predominio basal.

Between June 2009 and August 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic of the influenza H1N1 virus. Until June 2010, there were 3,572 confirmed cases of influenza AH1N1 virus respiratory infection in Colombia, with 239 deaths. Objectives: To describe the radiological studies of a group of 38 patients with a confirmed influenza A(H1N1) respiratory infection diagnosis who required hospitalization. The radiology results were correlated with clinical symptoms. Methodology: Medical records and image studies retrospective analysis of a 38 patient cohort with confirmed influenza A H1N1 infection diagnosis, who were hospitalized at the Universitario Mayor - Méderi Hospital in Bogota, Colombia between June 2009 and March 2010. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for ventilatory support during hospitalization. The image studies were reviewed by two radiologists with thoracic radiology experience. Results: Of 38 chest radiographs analyzed, 23 (60%) were normal. Of the 40% abnormal radiographs, the findings were consolidation and ground glass images. In the group requiring mechanical ventilation, all radiographs were abnormal. Conclusions: In our series, the image study findings were correlated with the severity of the clinical symptoms. Among the patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the thoracic radiography was normal in 79% of the cases. All patients who required mechanical ventilation had radiological alterations at admission. The most common radiographic finding in the group of patients who required mechanical ventilation was basal parenchymal consolidation.

Risk factors for mortality caused by Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in cancer patients

Introduction Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of 11–33% of nosocomial bloodstream infections and has a complication rate close to 50%. S. aureus accounts for 31% of isolates in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC), in Bogotá, Colombia, and is the main etiological agent of bacteremia. This study describes the risk factors for mortality caused by S. aureus bacteremia in cancer patients. Methods This is a retrospective, analytical, observational cohort study of 267 cases of bacteremia caused by S. aureus. Data from all bacteremic patients with proven cancer were extracted, and variables were introduced in a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 354 bacteremic patients were identified between 2001 and 2005, and 267 patients met the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these, death was considered secondary to S. aureus infection in 31%. Independent predictors of mortality related to S. aureus bacteremia in the multivariate analysis were: severity of sepsis at onset of bacteremia (HR 6.5, 95% CI 3.1–13.6), age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04), non-eradicable source of infection (HR 36.3, 95% CI 5.2–254.1), heart failure (HR 10.6; 95% CI 1.8–63.7), and primary bacteremia (HR 6.3, 95% CI 1.3–31.0).Conclusion Severity of sepsis at the time bacteremia was detected, a non-eradicable source of infection (including primary bacteremia), and comorbid conditions were risk factors for mortality caused by S. aureus bacteremia in cancer patients. These risk factors do not differ considerably from those of patients who do not have cancer (AU)

Introducción Staphylococcus aureus es responsible por el 11 al 33% de las bacteriemias nosocomiales y tiene una tasa de complicaciones cercana al 50%; S. aureus es responsible de 31% de los aislamientos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) en Bogotá, Colombia, y es el agente etiológico más importante de las bacteriemias. Este estudio tenía como objetivo describir los factores de riesgo de mortalidad ocasionada por la bacteriemia por S. aureus en pacientes con cáncer. Métodos Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectiva, analítico, observacion de 267 casos de bacteriemia ocasionada por S. aureus. Los datos clínicos de los pacientes con cáncer fueron obtenidos y las variables introducidas en un análisis multivariado utilizando un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox.Resultados354 pacientes bacteriemicos fueron detectados entre 2001 y 2005; 267 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y no fueron excluidos. 31% de los pacientes tuvieron como desenlace mortalidad secundaria a la infección por S. aureus. Los factores de riesgo de mortalidad independientes en el análisis multivariado fueron: estado de sepsis al inicio de la bacteriemia (razón de riesgos RR 6.5), edad (RR 1.03), fuente no erradicable de infección (RR 36.3), falla cardíaca (RR 10.6) y bacteriemia primaria (RR 6.3). Conclusión Los factores de riesgo para mortalidad ocasionada por bacteriemia por S. aureus fueron el estado de la sepsis al momento de la detección de la bacteriemia, una fuente no erradicable de infección (incluyendo bacteriemia primaria) y las patologías comórbidas. Estos factores de riesgo no varían considerablemente con respecto a pacientes sin cáncer (AU)

Risk factors for mortality caused by Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus aureus is the cause of 11-33% of nosocomial bloodstream infections and has a complication rate close to 50%. S. aureus accounts for 31% of isolates in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC), in Bogotá, Colombia, and is the main etiological agent of bacteremia. This study describes the risk factors for mortality caused by S. aureus bacteremia in cancer patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, analytical, observational cohort study of 267 cases of bacteremia caused by S. aureus. Data from all bacteremic patients with proven cancer were extracted, and variables were introduced in a multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 354 bacteremic patients were identified between 2001 and 2005, and 267 patients met the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these, death was considered secondary to S. aureus infection in 31%. Independent predictors of mortality related to S. aureus bacteremia in the multivariate analysis were: severity of sepsis at onset of bacteremia (HR 6.5, 95% CI 3.1-13.6), age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), non-eradicable source of infection (HR 36.3, 95% CI 5.2-254.1), heart failure (HR 10.6; 95% CI 1.8-63.7), and primary bacteremia (HR 6.3, 95% CI 1.3-31.0). CONCLUSION: Severity of sepsis at the time bacteremia was detected, a non-eradicable source of infection (including primary bacteremia), and comorbid conditions were risk factors for mortality caused by S. aureus bacteremia in cancer patients. These risk factors do not differ considerably from those of patients who do not have cancer.

[Therapeutic approach to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia]. / Enfoque terapéutico de la bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus.

Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen, responsible for 11-33% of the bacteremias acquired in the hospital setting and nearly 50% of those acquired in the community at large. The epidemiology of S. aureus bacteremia is discussed, with an special emphasis on the situation in Colombia and the resistance mechanisms against the major drug groups used for the treatment. The clinical keys and laboratory support for the appropriate clinical approaches are presented together with the therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with S. aureus bacteremia.

Enfoque terapéutico de la bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus / Therapeutic approach to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Staphylococcus aureus es un patógeno importante que causa cerca de 11 por ciento a 33 por ciento de las bacteriemias hospitalarias y un porcentaje importante de las adquiridas en la comunidad, con una tasa de complicaciones cercana a 50 por ciento. En la siguiente revisión se destaca la epidemiología de la bacteriemia por S. aureus, con especial referencia a la situación de este patógeno en Colombia, la frecuencia y los mecanismos de resistencia a los medicamentos más frecuentemente usados en este contexto, y se discuten los elementos semiológicos, clínicos y de laboratorio que influyen en el enfoque diagnóstico y terapéutico de los pacientes con bacteriemia por este microorganismo.

Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen, responsible for 11-33% of the bacteremias acquired in the hospital setting and nearly 50% of those acquired in the community at large. The epidemiology of S. aureus bacteremia is discussed, with an special emphasis on the situation in Colombia and the resistance mechanisms against the major drug groups used for the treatment. The clinical keys and laboratory support for the appropriate clinical approaches are presented together with the therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with S. aureus bacteremia.